期刊问答网 论文发表 期刊发表 期刊问答

已发表论文中存在一点小错误英语

  • 回答数

    6

  • 浏览数

    173

FQZgo
首页 > 期刊问答网 > 期刊问答 > 已发表论文中存在一点小错误英语

6个回答 默认排序1
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

budijing

已采纳
the short in presant

已发表论文中存在一点小错误英语

330 评论(14)

马建加

I'm very sorry!!!!!! For us to "survival" statistical results analysis error, cause a serious Very grateful for your For this reason, we carefully analyze all the "survival", found some results also similar errors, and finally we all correctly analyzes statistical results, and modify articles and pictures in that accordingly survival, but the original data without any In order to say we don't modify the original data, we will be the original data statistical results listed in detail At the same time, if necessary, we will send the original data, for your reference, to ensure that we do not modify the original Thank you again for your criticism correct, we for the serious mistakes again expressed profound
201 评论(13)

柚子candy

Very sorry!!!Because of our "survival rate" statistical analysis of the results of errors leads to this Very grateful to you for To this end, we carefully analyze all of the "survival rate", partial results similarly found similar errors, and finally all the correct analysis of statistical results, and modify the articles and pictures within the description of the corresponding survival rates, but without making any changes to the original To demonstrate we are not modifying the original data, we keep the original data results details listed At the same time, if necessary, we will send the original data in the Editorial Department, for your information, to make sure we do not modify the original Once again, thank you for your criticism, we express profound apologies this grave error
279 评论(13)

贴心小茉莉

We are sorry! ! ! Because our analysis of the statistical results of the "survival rate" error that led to this serious Very grateful for your To this end, we have carefully analyzed all the "survival rate", some of the results of the same similar error, and finally all of us to properly analyze the statistical results, and modify the corresponding survival rate within the description of articles and pictures, but the raw data without any change To that we do not have to modify the original data, the original statistical results in detail are listed At the same time, if necessary, we will send the raw data of the editorial board for your reference to ensure that we do not modify the original Thanks again for your criticism and we profoundly apologize for this serious error
226 评论(13)

zhaoyue007

当对一个问题深入研究后,发现自己已发表文章中有错误怎么办? 这个要看是大错还是小错了,如果是小错,可以直接给编辑写信说明下,大错的话,可能要发声明了,可以再写一篇文章纠正错误。yingying1588(站内联系TA)祝福祝福striveme(站内联系TA)有错误的文章太多了dale79(站内联系TA)有错就改再写文章基本上每个人的文章都有错误的炮灰大神(站内联系TA)是错误,还是缺陷,是不一样的。。。。如果是缺陷,没关系吧,后续的研究本来就是要解决原来的缺陷的;如果是错误。。。还是要交代的。。。dale79(站内联系TA)Originally posted by 炮灰大神 at 2010-12-11 23:25:30: 是错误,还是缺陷,是不一样的。。。。如果是缺陷,没关系吧,后续的研究本来就是要解决原来的缺陷的;如果是错误。。。还是要交代的。。。 我在仔细研究一些论文后 基本上都发现有错误 我在仔细研究一些论文后 基本上都发现有错误 我觉得有些错误也是可以理解的 只要不影响文章关键问题的阐述 有一个图的 标注错误了exp直线-A点划线-B 正确的 可是写的时候 反了~ 我觉得这不是原则上性质上的错,如果有必要的话跟编辑联系,如果别人很容易看出来是“笔误”而不是别的错,问题好像不大。。xffla(站内联系TA)如果是非常一般的sci,低if的,并且不是热门研究方向的,我想仔细看的人也不多Molu(站内联系TA)错误不可避免,有句话说“文章90%是有问题的,书籍90%是正确的”。visitor958(站内联系TA)你这个应该很明显吧,没有必要更正。还有,更正一般也难看到。。。结果错误或不全面,那样的更正才有意义。 有一个图的 标注错误了exp直线-A点划线-B 正确的 是错误,还是缺陷,是不一样的。。。。如果是缺陷,没关系吧,后续的研究本来就是要解决原来的缺陷的;如果是错误。。。还是要交代的。。。 大神,我有拼写错误。。。也不是拼写,是copy的时候完全没有改过来,就好像本来是猫,我文章上写的是狗,而且已经发表了,影响因子还5点多。。。纠结。。。
321 评论(13)

流喵呜水

我们单位都是这样发的,百度一下夏黎,文化、
244 评论(12)

相关问答