期刊问答网 论文发表 期刊发表 期刊问答
  • 回答数

    2

  • 浏览数

    153

gxv2042
首页 > 期刊问答网 > 期刊问答 > 大学生影视鉴赏论文3000字英文电影

2个回答 默认排序1
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

山里人家

已采纳
这个我可以试试,,看看能不能写,

大学生影视鉴赏论文3000字英文电影

84 评论(10)

Kimdna

If you've seen any of Roland Emmerich's previous disaster titles, you probably know what you're in for with this That being said, I felt 2012 had better acting and a more exciting storyline than the In order to enjoy this film, you have to ignore the ridiculously absurd premise about neutrinos and the sun catastrophically altering the earth's crust (forget about the Mayan prophecy, which is hardly mentioned) If you can overlook why the world is ending, this is actually an captivating film with some spectacular effects Yes, there are several perilous close calls that stretch the notion of "luck" Yes, the actors from all parts of the world become interconnected in what stretches the notion of "coincidence" No, it's not going to receive any best acting or screenplay Nevertheless, it's Cusack is great as the everyman Ejiofor grabs your attention as the young government scientist trying to prepare for the Glover and Harrison are also effective in smaller roles: Glover as the resolute President, and Harrison as the wackjob conspiracy theorist who might not be so crazy after Many other characters are merely stereotypes (like the Russian) or one dimensional (like the wife), but let's be honest, it's not the characters that we're coming to If you are, you'll probably be 2012 is not great but it entertains as a doomsday
334 评论(15)

相关问答