期刊问答网 论文发表 期刊发表 期刊问答

逻辑学基础论文范文初中数学

  • 回答数

    3

  • 浏览数

    329

leina1234
首页 > 期刊问答网 > 期刊问答 > 逻辑学基础论文范文初中数学

3个回答 默认排序1
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

skyflash202

已采纳
Easy to overlook the answer"Fact is stranger than fiction, we also have many interesting mathematical For example, in the ninth book, I now have a problem in the workbook, education, said: "this is a passenger train to the west, the east from 45 kilometers per hour line, stop, then after 5 hours just what the halfway point of the two cities from 18 km, two things WangXing? How many kilometres from town with the small English in this problem, the calculation method and the results are not the XingSuan king of the number of kilometers than small calculates km less, but the results of the two to This is why? You want to come? You count them two listed in the " Actually, this problem is we can very quickly made a kind of method is: 45 x 5 = 5 (km), 5 + 18 = 5 (km), 5 * 2 = 261 (km), but look close scrutiny, he felt something was Actually, here we overlooked a very important conditions, "this is just what the halfway point of the city from the conditions of 18 kilometers away from" the word ", not to say, or more than halfway If it is not from the middle point to 18 kilometre, column type is the front, if is a kind of more than 18 kilometers halfway, column type should is 45 by 5 = 5 (km), 5-18 = 5 (km), 5 x 2 = 189 (km) So the correct answer is: 45 x 5 = 5 (km), 5 + 18 = 5 (km), 5 * 2 = 261 (km) and 45 x 5 = 5 (km), 5-18 = 5 (km), 5 x 2 = 189 (km) Two answers, WangXing answers with the small English answer is In the daily learning, often have many problems, aim to answer is more in practice or neglected in the exam, we need to carefully examines the topic is, life experience, close scrutiny, correct understanding of Otherwise easily overlooked the mistake, the About "0"0, it is the earliest human contact Our ancestors started only know no and have no is 0, 0, so did? Remember the elementary school teacher once said, "any number of minus itself is equal to 0, 0 means without " That is simply not We all know that the 0 degrees centigrade thermometer said the freezing point of water ( a standard under the pressure of the mixture of water temperature), including 0 is solid and liquid water But in Chinese characters, 0 means that a zero, such as: 1 more pieces), Decimal 2) not certain Thus, we know that the "no amount is 0, but not without number, 0 solid and liquid said the differentiator, ""Any divided by " no significance for This is the primary school teacher still talking to a conclusion about the "0", then the division (primary) is divided into several copies will be a, how much A whole cannot into a "0" no Then I realized the a / 0 0 0 to limit can be expressed in the variable (a variable in the process of changing its absolute than any small forever is positive), shall be equal to a variable in the infinite (changes in its absolute than any big is positive) Get a theorem about 0 "zero limits of variables, called an infinitesimal"

逻辑学基础论文范文初中数学

163 评论(8)

墨憨子

二难推理是假言选言推理的一种特殊形式。如果能在日常思维中熟练而灵活的加以运用,就会感受到逻辑智慧带给我们的极大便利,化解各种为难,在生命本能的基础上增添许多人生智慧,营造自己更高的人生境界;如在辩论中运用自如,可以使对方陷入左右为难,进退两难的境地,树立自己的观点、展示自己的理论,如期实现自己所图,在这里二难推理展示出了它不可抗拒的逻辑力量。 一 二难推理的形式及其特点 二难推理的的定义 有两个假言判断(包括充分条件假言判断和必要条件假言判断)和一个二支选言判断做前提构成的假言选言推理,由于这种推理的结论总是令人难以接受,或“左右为难”、或“进退两难”,因此也叫二难推理。 二难推理的形式:简单构成式,简单破坏式,复杂构成式,复杂破坏式。 简单构成式:如果P,则R;如果Q,则R;或P或Q;总之R。 符号化是:((P→R)∧(Q→R))∧(P∨Q)→R 特点: ⑴所取的两个充分条件假言判断具有不同的前件(相互矛盾),却有相同的后件; ⑵小前提是二支选言判断,有选择的肯定有矛盾关系的前件; ⑶结论是相同的后件。因此,不论肯定那个前提条件,都得到相同的后件,而这个结论是不愿接受的。 简单破坏式:如果P,则Q,如果P,则R;或非P,或非R;所以,总之非P 符号化是:((P→Q)∧(P→R))∧(>P∨>R)→>P 特点: ⑴假言前提有相同的前件和不同的后件; ⑵小前提是二支选言判断,有选择地否定具有反对关系的后件 ⑶结论否定相同的前件 复杂构成式:如果P,则R,如果Q,则S;或P,或Q,所以,或R或S。 符号化是:((P→R)∧(Q→S))∧(P∨Q)→(R∨S) 特点: ⑴二假言前提的前件不同,后件也不同; ⑵选言前提有选择地肯定假言前提的前件; ⑶结论必然有选择地肯定相应的后件。 复杂破坏式:如果P,那么R,如果Q,那么S;非R,或非S;所以非P或非Q。 符号化是:((P→R)∧(Q→S))∧(>R∨>S)→(>P∨>Q) 特点: ⑴假言前件后件都不同; ⑵选言前提有选择地否定假言前提的后件; ⑶结论必然有选择地否定相应的前件。 二 祥林嫂面临的“二难选择” 祥林嫂死了丈夫,按照婆家的境况和农村的惯例,她势必要被卖掉,换来一笔钱来给小叔子做聘礼。但“贞女不嫁二夫”,“一马不配二鞍”,否则就是“败坏风俗”,就是“谬种”。前者是封建宗法制度的族权在作祟,后者是封建宗法制度的夫权在作祟。 祥林嫂嫁与不嫁都“有罪”,她疑惑了,摆在他面前的是一个“二难选择”。 这个“二难选择”,作为前提的两个假言判断,其前件一是肯定性的,前件二是否定性的,他们之间是矛盾关系,其后件均为否定性的,他们之间可以视为并列关系,结论是个不相容选言判断。符合简单构成式,即为: 如果P,则R; 如果Q,则R; 或P或Q; 总之R。 按照这个模式稍加整理,可以吧以上有关内容写成下列形式: 如果同意再嫁(P),则违背了夫权(有罪R); 如果拒绝再嫁(Q),则违背了族权(有罪R); 祥林嫂或同意再嫁(或P),或不同意再嫁(或Q); 总之祥林嫂是有罪的(R)。 祥林嫂面临的这个“二难选择”,深刻的暴露了封建宗法制度本身的矛盾和荒谬。 或许,对封建社会的女子来说,夫权比族权更令人畏惧,因此,面对这个“二难选择”祥林嫂选择了拒绝再嫁(Q),所以她就“撞香案”了。但是她后来还是“服从”了。虽然这是族权的逼迫,虽然祥林嫂做过殊死的抵抗,虽然她很无可奈何,但是夫权仍然没有原谅她的“节失”,他后来的命运就是证明。祥林嫂的“节失”完全是族权造成的,而“节失”得后果却要祥林嫂来承担。这就又暴露出了封建宗法制度的不合理。
184 评论(11)

dkyxmch

逻辑与生活 你自己去论文网站搜索下 这里都是复制的 没意义
284 评论(12)

相关问答