期刊问答网 论文发表 期刊发表 期刊问答
  • 回答数

    4

  • 浏览数

    111

anshelly
首页 > 期刊问答网 > 期刊问答 > 经典英语电影赏析论文

4个回答 默认排序1
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

wxg1990

已采纳
洛丽塔、越狱、暮光之城

经典英语电影赏析论文

237 评论(9)

baozhuzhu

“Kingnbsp;Arthur“nbsp;Movienbsp;Review--------Anbsp;Newnbsp;Takenbsp;Onnbsp;Annbsp;Oldnbsp;LegendMynbsp;knowledgenbsp;ofnbsp;thenbsp;legendarynbsp;Kingnbsp;Arthurnbsp;andnbsp;hisnbsp;Knightsnbsp;ofnbsp;thenbsp;Roundnbsp;Tablenbsp;comesnbsp;chieflynbsp;throughnbsp;watchingnbsp;moviesnbsp;basednbsp;onnbsp;thenbsp;heroicnbsp;bsp;Ifnbsp;askednbsp;priornbsp;tonbsp;thisnbsp;filmnbsp;ifnbsp;Kingnbsp;Arthurnbsp;reallynbsp;existed,nbsp;you’dnbsp;probablynbsp;havenbsp;elicitednbsp;annbsp;answernbsp;fromnbsp;menbsp;whichnbsp;amountednbsp;tonbsp;anbsp;bsp;Nownbsp;afternbsp;seeingnbsp;“Kingnbsp;Arthur,”nbsp;I’mnbsp;relievednbsp;tonbsp;findnbsp;mynbsp;‘maybe’nbsp;answernbsp;wouldnbsp;havenbsp;beennbsp;Therenbsp;isn’tnbsp;anbsp;kindlynbsp;Seannbsp;Connerynbsp;figurenbsp;innbsp;thisnbsp;2004nbsp;versionnbsp;ofnbsp;“Kingnbsp;A”nbsp;No,nbsp;thisnbsp;versionnbsp;takesnbsp;viewersnbsp;onnbsp;anbsp;journeynbsp;withnbsp;thenbsp;mannbsp;whonbsp;maynbsp;havenbsp;beennbsp;thenbsp;inspirationnbsp;fornbsp;thenbsp;legendnbsp;asnbsp;henbsp;fightsnbsp;tonbsp;servenbsp;andnbsp;protectnbsp;Romenbsp;andnbsp;itsnbsp;bsp;Wantingnbsp;nothingnbsp;morenbsp;thannbsp;tonbsp;putnbsp;downnbsp;hisnbsp;swordnbsp;afternbsp;morenbsp;thannbsp;anbsp;decadenbsp;ofnbsp;fightingnbsp;andnbsp;returnnbsp;tonbsp;hisnbsp;lifenbsp;innbsp;hisnbsp;belovednbsp;Rome,nbsp;Arthurnbsp;(Clivenbsp;Owen)nbsp;andnbsp;hisnbsp;Knightsnbsp;arenbsp;forcednbsp;tonbsp;takenbsp;onnbsp;onenbsp;finalnbsp;missionnbsp;beforenbsp;beingnbsp;releasednbsp;fromnbsp;theirnbsp;commitmentnbsp;tonbsp;servenbsp;Rbsp;Whennbsp;theirnbsp;lastnbsp;tasknbsp;leadsnbsp;Arthurnbsp;tonbsp;thenbsp;conclusionnbsp;Romenbsp;asnbsp;henbsp;knewnbsp;itnbsp;nonbsp;longernbsp;exists,nbsp;henbsp;comesnbsp;tonbsp;believenbsp;everythingnbsp;henbsp;standsnbsp;fornbsp;andnbsp;allnbsp;thenbsp;battlesnbsp;he’snbsp;wagednbsp;onnbsp;behalfnbsp;ofnbsp;hisnbsp;countrynbsp;andnbsp;religionnbsp;werenbsp;fornbsp;bsp;Leftnbsp;tonbsp;decidenbsp;onnbsp;hisnbsp;ownnbsp;whonbsp;tonbsp;fightnbsp;andnbsp;whonbsp;tonbsp;befriend,nbsp;Arthurnbsp;joinsnbsp;withnbsp;hisnbsp;formernbsp;enemiesnbsp;tonbsp;savenbsp;Britainnbsp;fromnbsp;thenbsp;invadingnbsp;Saxons,nbsp;changingnbsp;hisnbsp;destinynbsp;whilenbsp;changingnbsp;thenbsp;coursenbsp;ofnbsp;Almostnbsp;rightnbsp;offnbsp;thenbsp;bat,nbsp;“Kingnbsp;Arthur”nbsp;hadnbsp;anbsp;majornbsp;hurdlenbsp;tonbsp;overcomenbsp;asnbsp;thenbsp;actionnbsp;onnbsp;screennbsp;echoednbsp;thenbsp;actionnbsp;innbsp;Disney’snbsp;disastrousnbsp;“Thenbsp;Alamo”nbsp;–nbsp;thenbsp;battlesnbsp;innbsp;bothnbsp;filmsnbsp;arenbsp;depictednbsp;asnbsp;bloodlessnbsp;bsp;Howevernbsp;atnbsp;leastnbsp;innbsp;thenbsp;casenbsp;ofnbsp;“Kingnbsp;Arthur,”nbsp;thenbsp;fightnbsp;scenesnbsp;themselvesnbsp;lookednbsp;bsp;Thenbsp;stuntsnbsp;werenbsp;choreographednbsp;sonbsp;thatnbsp;whilenbsp;wenbsp;didn’tnbsp;seenbsp;muchnbsp;bloodnbsp;flowing,nbsp;thenbsp;illusionnbsp;ofnbsp;violencenbsp;andnbsp;deathnbsp;bsp;Mostnbsp;of
273 评论(14)

淘气值不值

自己写吧,自己体会这部电影写出100个字也比别人的1000字收益多得多,真的,别为了应付考试
357 评论(12)

涪陵涪陵3

If you've seen any of Roland Emmerich's previous disaster titles, you probably know what you're in for with this That being said, I felt 2012 had better acting and a more exciting storyline than the In order to enjoy this film, you have to ignore the ridiculously absurd premise about neutrinos and the sun catastrophically altering the earth's crust (forget about the Mayan prophecy, which is hardly mentioned) If you can overlook why the world is ending, this is actually an captivating film with some spectacular effects Yes, there are several perilous close calls that stretch the notion of "luck" Yes, the actors from all parts of the world become interconnected in what stretches the notion of "coincidence" No, it's not going to receive any best acting or screenplay Nevertheless, it's Cusack is great as the everyman Ejiofor grabs your attention as the young government scientist trying to prepare for the Glover and Harrison are also effective in smaller roles: Glover as the resolute President, and Harrison as the wackjob conspiracy theorist who might not be so crazy after Many other characters are merely stereotypes (like the Russian) or one dimensional (like the wife), but let's be honest, it's not the characters that we're coming to If you are, you'll probably be 2012 is not great but it entertains as a doomsday
173 评论(14)

相关问答